The SRN Executive Council Meeting was organized by Zoom in 19th of May of 2025. Check this link for the approved minutes:
Month: June 2025
SRN Screenwriting Teaching Innovation Award
The Screenwriting Research Network (SRN) Teaching Innovation Award recognizes the achievements of an outstanding faculty scholar whose work demonstrates original approaches to supporting the teaching and learning development of screenwriters and scholars of screenwriting. The committee is particularly interested in reviewing materials from applicants who look critically at their research agenda and teaching practice and consider how in addition to being innovative in their classrooms they are intentionally integrating their screenwriting research into their pedagogy.
Additionally, the committee would like to encourage applicants to:
- Demonstrate the significance and value of their
- Address how their research and teaching practice is new to the
- Consider the exportability of their teaching innovation (how the practice can be adapted by other educators).
- Demonstrate an overall awareness of their research and teaching innovations and what they are trying to achieve. In other words, clearly articulate pedagogical objectives and the broader significance of their
As a member of SRN, you may self-nominate for the Screenwriting Teaching Innovation Award, or you may nominate a colleague. Each nominee is responsible for collecting, collating, and preparing the application materials. Please submit a nomination packet of no more than 20 pages, including the following materials:
- Two-page summary statement describing an innovative assignment or teaching method including goals for the assignment or instructional technique, implementation in the classroom, student feedback and interaction with the assignment or teaching method, student success, and an explanation of reflective teaching and adjustments in response to student work and
- Three-page (max) CV highlighting accomplishments in teaching including screenwriting courses developed and taught, student mentoring, student successes, teaching workshops, institutional teaching awards, or published scholarship on the teaching and learning development of screenwriters and screenwriting scholars.
• Sample assignment or syllabus.
- Two letters of support from colleagues, department chair, dean, or former
- Other supporting documentation such as anonymous student evaluations; course reviews from colleagues; press releases about teaching-related achievements; evidence of previous teaching awards; or video recordings of lectures or
Nomination packets are due July 15. The SRN Teaching Innovation Award Committee will select two awardees for 2025. Awardees will be notified August 15, and awards will be presented at the 2025 SRN conference. Please direct questions to Anna Weinstein and send application packet materials to the Teaching Innovation Award three judges:
Armando Fumagalli – armando.fumagalli@unicatt.it
Dee Hughes – dhughes@bournemouth.ac.uk
Anna Weinstein – aweinst6@kennesaw.edu
A Matter of Historical Record – Our Conferences
A valuable historical rescue work was carried out in relation to all keynote speakers of past SRN conferences at the request of the Executive Board under the leadership of Prof. Jan Cernik. Find out more here!
SRN Newsletter June 2025
Monthly, SRN newsletter keeps members informed regarding our most recent activities. Here you can find the newsletter prepared for June 2025:
Work has begun on recovering abstracts presented by keynote speakers at SRN conferences
The SRN Executive Board is currently conducting research and recovering the lists of keynote speakers from past annual conferences and their abstracts or full presentations (when available). This valuable material has been recovered and can help many of our members in their research. The recovery work was carried out by Prof. Jan Cernik. Here you can see the results obtained so far.
History of SRN Conferences recovered
Through meticulous research by SRN executive board members, led by Professor Jan Cernik, the history of keynote speakers at SRN conferences has been recovered. Below, you can read this precious and important work. Also, below find the main list where you can read the complete list of keynote speeches from all conferences.
List of keynote speeches from Screenwriting Research Network conferences
Keynote speakers at SRN conferences traditionally set topics for discussion, suggest research opportunities or bring inspiring insights from the audiovisual industry. They also often represent the region in which the conference is held. These are the main reasons why we have decided to compile a list of keynote speakers as part of our organisation’s history mapping activity.
This list was created thanks to the SRN community in January 2025. Following the call, many of our members responded and each contributed a piece to the puzzle.
But the list is not complete. If you have information about missing speakers, titles of their presentations, abstracts, full texts or follow-up publications, please send it to this e-mail.
Leeds (2008, UK)
Helsinki (2009, Finland)
- Torben Grodal: Biology and Culture in Storytelling
- Ian Macdonald: Thin air and solid ground: rethinking screenwriting research
- David Howard: Beginning, Middle and End – Not Necessarily in that Order
Copenhagen (2010, Denmark)
- Janet Steiger: Considering the Script as Blueprint in 2010
- Considering the Script as Blueprint in 2012,” Northern Lights [Denmark], 10 (2012), 75-90.
- Steven Maras: On Disciplinarity, Practice, and Approach: Overcoming the ‘Object Problem’ in Screenwriting Research
- Jill Nelmes: Analysing the Screenplay
Brussels (2011, Belgium)
- David Bordwell: I Love a Mystery: Screenwriting and Storytelling in 1940s Hollywood
- Jean-Claude Carrière: L’enseignement du scénario
- Steven Price: The Screenplay: An Accelerated Critical History
- Marida di Crosta: From Scriptwriting to Community Story-Telling
Sydney (2012, Australia)
- Adrian Martin: Where Do Cinematic Ideas Come From?
- Helen Grace: Moving Image on the Other Side of History
- JJ Murphy: Where are you from? Place as an Alternative Form of Scripting
- Keynote on the importance and value of treating location as another `character’ in independent cinema.
Madison, Wisconsin (2013, USA)
- Larry Gross
- Jon Raymond
- Kristin Thompson
Potsdam-Babelsberg (2014, Germany)
- Milcho Manchevski: Why I Like Writing and Hate Directing: Notes of a Recovering Writer-Director
- Jutta Brückner: (Auto)biographic Storytelling
- Brian Winston: Screenwriting in Documentary Filmmaking
London (2015, UK)
- Hossein Amini
- Kathryn Millard
- In her keynote address she explored the relationship between improvisation and composition in creative practice and its particular relevance to the role of the writer in contemporary screen media and digital ecologies.
- Jonathan Powell: Sculptors and plumbers: The writer and television
- In his Keynote Address ‘Sculptors and Plumbers’ (from Billy Wilder’s famous comment that asking Scott Fitzgerald to write a screenplay was like hiring a great sculptor to do a plumbing job), Jonathan Powell looked at the intersection between inspiration and industry as it affects the writer’s place in the world of television fiction. He used his experience gained as a producer, commissioner and executive working with some of the leading British TV writers of the 20th Century and reflected on the position of the writer as the primary forcebehind the creation of drama for the smaller screen.
- Full text: https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/27787478/1_Powell_AAM.pdf
- Keynote was subsequently published in the Journal of Screenwriting: https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.7.3.255_3
- Ronald Harwood (interviewed by Christine Geraghty)
- Anamaria Marinca
Leeds (2016, UK)
- Soni Jorgensen
- In her keynote address she talked about developing unique screenplays by exploring the relationship between Character, Plot and the Human Experience.
- Peter Bowker
- Kristyn Gorton
- Her talk will consider the role of emotion and affect within television. Drawing on examples from contemporary television and her work from Media Audiences, she will consider the ways in which emotion is constructed and valued in television.
- Tony Garnett: What exactly is a screenplay? What is the place of a screenwriter? Individualism in a collaborative creative act
- Liz Rosenthal
- Liz will talk about taking a new approach to concept and story development, helping creatives and producers develop cross-platform, and interactive formats. At PttP’s Labs they have been creating methods to incubate projects in a new way where they get storytellers to approach development in a platform agnostic way, going back to core story concepts, thinking carefully about how to engage users on appropriate platforms and organically growing projects.
Dunedin (2017, New Zealand)
- Ian W. Macdonald
- Dave Gibson
- Gaylene Preston
- Fiona Samuel, Kathryn Burnett
- Rachel Lang
Milan (2018, Italy)
- Eleonora Andreatta: Public broadcasting in the global market era
- Rai is a public service broadcaster whose identity is connected to the relationship it has with Italy, Italian values, history and culture. For this reason, Rai Fiction can’t be just a financier, but it is also a commissioning editor, with a complete vision of the product, and the clear challenge to deal with national and International audiences. Hence the need for an industrial studio-like structure, suitable for the production of Tv series, in order to get top ratings in Italy and to compete on a global level, leveraging on Italian history, art and creativity. Rai’s breakthrough: not only being a leader in Italian television but also partnering with global TV players, -from cable TV to on demand platforms-, to produce great International content.
- Paolo Braga: Different Industries, Different Screenwriting Schools. The Italian storytelling approach to TV seriality compared to the US method
- Each industry has its own way of crafting stories for TV. Different organizational models in the task of breaking down stories; the influence of titles which have been successful in a particular market; the peculiar viewing attitudes of a domestic audience… all these factors make screenwriters adopt a combination of writing techniques peculiar to each country. Even if the US writing school has imposed itself as a universal standard — the “orthodoxy” (I.W. Macdonald, 2013) — deviations from its lessons — slight or significant, depending on the case — define the originality of an industry’s storytelling. In this perspective, I am going to consider the Italian school of screenwriting for TV, in order to highlight what is unique to it in comparison to the North American narrative method. For this purpose, I will focus on two cases of international remakes. I will compare a) Red Band Society (Fox, 2014), the unsuccessful US version of the Catalan series Polseres Vermelles, to Braccialetti Rossi (Rai 1, 2014-2017), the successful Italian version of the same medical teen-drama, and b) Parenthood (NBC, 2010-2015), the original US version of a network family drama, to its Italian remake Tutto può succedere (Rai 1, 2015-present). My analyses will show that differences in the degree of thematization and the level of drama characters have to face within each episode are key elements to define the Italian school of writing for TV.
- Warren Buckland: “Mind our mouths and beware our talk”: Stylometric analysis of character dialogue in The Darjeeling Limited
- Film dialogue has recently received detailed scholarly attention (“Realism in Screenplay Dialogue,” Jill Nelmes 2013; Film Dialogue, edited by Jeff Jaeckle, 2013, etc.). In this paper I build upon this scholarship via current developments in Humanities Computing – specifically, stylometric studies that employ statistics to quantify the language of texts. I aim to study the distinctive linguistic traits of the dialogue in Wes Anderson’s films, and attempt to identify and quantify the stylistic habits (the distinctive voice) of individual characters. Analysis of the dialogue of the three Whitman brothers in The Darjeeling Limited (screenplay by Wes Anderson, Roman Coppola, and Jason Schwartzman, 2007) will serve as a case study.
This paper takes as its starting point J.F. Burrows’s seminal stylometric study of dialogue in Jane Austen’s novels (Burrows, Computation into Criticism, 1987), although it also draws upon more recent developments in computer-based stylometric studies (including Digital Literary Studies, by Hoover, Culpeper, and O’Halloran, 2014), plus the Voyant Tools software package. This paper forms part of a larger project that employs stylometric methods of authorship attribution to study the authorship of co-written screenplays.
- Keynote speech was published by Journal of Screenwriting: https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/josc.10.2.131_1
- Daniele Cesarano: The Pleasure of Storytelling. From Cinema to Television
- I wrote my first script at 24, the last one at 54. The first was a film, which I also directed, full of unrealistic ambitions and quotes from other films. The last was the final episode of the first season of Suburra – The Series, full of unrealistic ambitions and self-citations. That’s why I decided to stop. I can not stay away from the ambitions. As a writer I went through the audiovisual revolution, the transition from cinema to television, which for me, but not only for me, was the transition from the duty of a story to the pleasure of the story-telling. It was the transition from having to mean something to the pleasure of entertaining. It was breathing. It was fun. It was the television series. At least as long as it lasted…
- Luisa Cotta Ramosino: Medici. Masters of Florence. Challenges and compromises of an International coproduction: characters, storytelling and production issues.
- Creating, writing and producing a period drama poses a series of challenges connected with the approach not only to the original historical materials, but also to the different traditions and practice of storytelling of the partners involved.
Deciding how far to go with creativity in interpreting the facts and how much faithful you want to be to the historical background is just the beginning of a process where finding a common language is the key.
Medici. Masters of Florence, a successful Tv series (Rai, Netflix, 2016- ; starring Dustin Hoffman and Richard Madden in its first season and Sean Bean and Daniel Sharman in the second one) created by two American screenwriters, produced by an Italian production company and an Italian public broadcaster with a London based writers room (where British and Italian authors shared their talent and practice) is an interesting case study of how and how much production preconditions can influence the storytelling both virtuously and negatively.
The evolution in the writing process along the now three seasons of the show (the third will be shot in the last months of 2018, when the second will be broadcasted) is the key to offer an insight on the difficult adventure of creating an International series starting from a country with a relatively small market and trying to get the best from different traditions both in terms of creativity and actual organization of work.
- Neil Landau: Global TV On Demand: Authenticity and Empathy Across the Cultural Divide
- How our need for human connection has expanded the global television marketplace from conventional, formulaic program genres into more localized, specific, authentic “native content”. This talk will explore the digital television revolution that’s disrupted the once dominant linear, broadcast network business models that once cast the broadest net in order to generate the highest possible overnight ratings into diverse, niche content with an emphasis on authenticity. Niche is the new mainstream, and the mandates at streaming (SVOD) behemoths like Netflix are variety and exclusivity. With Amazon, Hulu, Apple, Facebook, and YouTube all producing their own programs, there has never been a higher demand for fresh, non formulaic content, or a better time to showcase your unique, original voice as writer, producer, director and/or showrunner. The more specific you make a story, the more universal it becomes.
Porto (2019, Portugese)
- Thomas Elsaesser – The (Re-)Turn to Non-Linear Storytelling: Time Travel and Looped Narratives
- Why has there been such a comeback of looped narratives and time travel films since the 1990s? Answers to this question should take us beyond seeing films such as Groundhog Day, Deja Vu, Donnie Darko, Inception or Source Code as the implementation of the new possibilities of story-telling opened up by digital media, with non-linear editing and random access as the ‘new normal’. The reasons we can give should also take us beyond the evident analogies with interactive video games: In the age of ‘post truth’, when perception of reality itself has become malleable, the term ‘non-linear’ has taken on political, philosophical as well as narratological meaning. My talk will argue that there are also specifically historical circumstances that favour time travel as a mode that highlights not – as one might expect – new forms of agency and empowerment, but instead epistemological deadlocks, traumatic events as well as ethical dilemmas.
- Christoph Bode – Opening Up Spaces of Possibility: How Future Narratives Impact Story-telling in the Movies
- Future Narratives, unlike Past Narratives, are not about events(that have already occurred or can be imagined to have occurred). Rather, their smallest narrative unit is not an event, but a node. A node is a situation that can be continued in more than just one way, possibly in a multiplicity of ways. If a narrative contains at least one node, it qualifies as a Future Narrative, though many Future Narratives contain many more than just one node. If you don’t like the terminology, you could also call Future Narratives ‘Nodal Narratives’ instead. The most basic difference between Past Narratives and Future Narratives is that Past Narratives are uni-linear, whereas Future Narratives are by definition multi-linear. Past Narratives give you a uni-linear trajectory, but multi-linear Future Narratives open up spaces of possibility instead.
The exciting thing about Future Narratives is that they can be found in print, in film, in video games, in scenarios of world climate change, and in other simulations of future trends – they are all over the place. Cutting across all media and genre classifications and even straddling the fiction-non-fiction divide, the multifarious corpus of Future Narratives lacked a theory and a poetics until the publication of the 5-volume set of ERC-funded research in 2013, Narrating Futures(published with Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, all in the same year).
In my talk, I will try and explain how narrative in general negotiates the poles of order and chaos, or of meaning and contingency, and produces such a thing as the semblance of narrative necessity, before I zoom in on how Future Narratives prove a game-changer to this existential play and how, in particular, movies that operate according to the Future Narrative paradigm open up new spaces of possibility for the viewer as well: although not all relevant movies (e.g., Run Lola Run, Sliding Doors) invite active intervention from the spectators, others certainly do: they not only invite, they necessitate agency. Evidently, the move from relatively inflexible media like the book, the movie etc. to more inter-active media (DVD, online gaming …) is a decisive one. The advent of more and more Future Narrative-based offers in the second half of the twentieth century is therefore read as a shift of media-historical importance that is bound to radically re-define our ideas about what story-telling is for and who it is that ultimately produces the meaning we live by.
- Maria Poulaki – Reflections on narrative complexity
- This talk will reflect on the interplay between chaos and order as characteristic of the complexity of narrative. It will do so by adopting a complex systems perspective, which allows to approach at once complex textual structures and the complexity of our cognitive encounter with them. Concepts already established in narratology and traditionally associated with anti-narrative devices, such as self-reflexivity, loose causality, and description, can be linked to equivalent dynamic or ‘chaotic’ processes of systems’ emergence, such as self-reference, nonlinearity, and emergence. These can in turn be highlighted as properties of the cognitive dynamics of narrative, driven by ambiguity and uncertainty. Thus narrative complexity lies ‘before’ narrative (the latter traditionally conceived as a set ordered schema or structure), and in the chaotic process of its formation.
Oxford (2021, online)
- Elizabeth Kilgarriff: Pushing the boundaries between industry and academia (in conversation with Paolo Russo)
- Murray Smith: The portability of character
Vienna (2022, Austria)
- Eleftheria Thanouli: Complexity and/ or agency? character, agency and plot structures in post-classical narration
- Dina Iordinova: Bridging platforms and continents: the normative narrator
Columbia, Missouri (2023, USA)
- Meg LeFauve, Lorien McKenna
- Phil Lazebnik
- Jeff Melvoin
Olomouc (2024, Czech Republic)
- Peter Krämer: Auteurism, Adaptations and Beyond: Reflections on 40 Years of Studying Production Histories and Story Development
- Kamila Zlatušková: Education as a way to dialogue between new creators and major broadcasters
- Donat F. Keutsch, Gabriele C. Sindler: PROCLAMATION ON BREAKING THE RULES! Insights into the skills and the practical art of story & script development.
Minutes SRN Executive Council Meeting (March 2025)
The SRN Executive Council Meeting was organized by Zoom in 17th March 2025. Check this link for the approved minutes:
Minutes SRN Executive Council Meeting (February 2025)
SRN Executive Council Meeting
(via Zoom)
February 17, 2025
7am Los Angeles
Circulation list: Rosanne Welch (RW), Jan Cernik (JC), Isadora Garcia Avis (IGA), Lucian Georgescu (LG). Clarissa Miranda (CM), Romana Turina (RT), Juan Carlos Carrillo (JC).
ECR Hugo Armando Arcinega (HA)
- Apologies for any absences
Isadora, Romana
- Approval of Minutes of previous meeting.
Point 4 – JC will email adjustment to Secretary. With that donem JC approves and Hugo seconds.
- IG/JCC – Update on Membership email transfer and numbers of new members since SRN2024.
Tabled for March meeting
- Take group zoom photo
- JC: Newsletter Update –JC Thanked for all the time put on this project. ALSO, for collecting list of previous Keynote Speakers for placement on the website. JC reports that all info minus a few abstracts is in for placement on new section of website.
LG – can use the information gathered on previous conferences to add into edits for future Conversations.
- RT: Working Groups Update – Organizing Script Reading Working Group Zoom for Feb 28 to see how many SRN members are interested.
- GROUP decides to choose a month to invite Working Group Members to attend an EC meeting in the next couple of months. Maybe March or April. Also to invite Craig Batty to an EC meeting for update on SRN2025?
–Will he be free to visit? RW will email.
- JC –”Sustainable Screenwriting Working Group” within SRN
2 people answered with interest – JC will continue – not tied to current research.
LG – still has monies for another small conference
- IGA – Update on when to post about Annual Award Nominations (Teaching, Books and Articles)
- LG: SRN2024 Video production update.
LG – conversation with Steven Maras, keynote speaker at Copenhagen in 2010, available for uploading. Other interviews are nearly an hour long. Plans are to release Conversations with previous Chairs, EC members, then move on to full coverage of Vienna conference, then the Oxford online conference Conversation by summertime.
RW- Has idea about naming a Historian as new position in EC? – Group agrees it’s worth putting up for vote to add to Constitution during next AGM
- CM: Conference in Brazil in the city of Florianópolis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Fall Semester 2026?
Meeting is set up with 3 screenwriting teachers at the uni – ideas: all students could join the conference at no cost; numbers who may attend/add it as a hybrid so those who can’t pay to attend can still attend. Will have meeting in March with uni. Cinema born 15 years ago. For hybrid they are used to it. All agree hybrid option helps academics whose unis don’t offer travel funding and exposure to new perspectives help us all.
- Formally accepted bids for sites for:
Oxford 2026 (in hand) / (AND Florianopolis in April – forthcoming)
Mexico City 2027
Milan 2028 (in hand along with email from Armando Fumagilli moving from 2027 to 2028)
Navarre 2029 (forthcoming)
- HA: Presentation of the report of monthly results of social media –
HA – Lots of good material to post.
Date of next meeting(s): March 17.
Future Meetings: Apr 21(Easter Monday), May 19, June 16, July 21, Aug. 18, Sept. 19 (in person at SRN2025).
SRN Book/Publication Awards 2025
The SRN AWARDS will celebrate the 6th edition at the 2025 Conference in Adelaide, Australia this September 2025.
We invite all members and colleagues to submit Nominations for the best publications of 2024/2025 by the deadline of 15 June 2025 for articles published between 1 June 2024 & 31 May 2025.Both nominations and self-nominations are welcome. Winners will be announced at the 2025 SRN Conference in Adelaide, Australia.
The Awards this year will be again in two categories:
Best Monograph – for single-authored or co-authored volumes (any format)
Best Journal Article/Book Chapter – Both articles and chapters normally range around 6-8,000 words but the format may vary.
While no ratings of journals/publishers will be a factor in the evaluation of submissions, all publications should be scholarly, fully peer-reviewed work underpinned by substantial research specifically in the area of Screenwriting Studies.
Guidelines for the submission of nominations:
All submissions in both categories should be made directly to all the members of the Jury (see contact details below) by 15 June 2025. However, early submissions are most welcome and encouraged.
MONOGRAPHS – Nominees and self-nominees should send hard copies of their monographs directly to each Juror via regular mail/courier. Publishers are usually happy to supply complimentary evaluation/inspection copies: only where this is really not possible (including, for instance, volumes due out very close to the deadline), authors can send a PDF copy of the approved preprint manuscript (in this case via email) as a backup option.
ARTICLES/CHAPTERS – Individual journal articles (i.e. not the whole journal) or chapters (i.e. not the whole book) should be sent as PDF (as per preprint approved draft) directly to each of the Jurors via email.
All submissions will be evaluated independently by our Jury of distinguished academics:
Professor Carmen Sofia Brenes csbrenes@gmail.com
Leslie Kreiner Wilson leslie.kreiner@pepperdine.edu
Garrabost Jayalakshmi g.jayalakshmi@napier.ac.uk
If you have any enquiries, please contact Rosanne Welch Rwelch@stephens.edu