Work has begun on recovering abstracts presented by keynote speakers at SRN conferences

The SRN Executive Board is currently conducting research and recovering the lists of keynote speakers from past annual conferences and their abstracts or full presentations (when available). This valuable material has been recovered and can help many of our members in their research. The recovery work was carried out by Prof. Jan Cernik. Here you can see the results obtained so far.

History of SRN Conferences recovered

Through meticulous research by SRN executive board members, led by Professor Jan Cernik, the history of keynote speakers at SRN conferences has been recovered. Below, you can read this precious and important work. Also, below find the main list where you can read the complete list of keynote speeches from all conferences.

List of keynote speeches from Screenwriting Research Network conferences

Keynote speakers at SRN conferences traditionally set topics for discussion, suggest research opportunities or bring inspiring insights from the audiovisual industry. They also often represent the region in which the conference is held. These are the main reasons why we have decided to compile a list of keynote speakers as part of our organisation’s history mapping activity.

This list was created thanks to the SRN community in January 2025. Following the call, many of our members responded and each contributed a piece to the puzzle.

But the list is not complete. If you have information about missing speakers, titles of their presentations, abstracts, full texts or follow-up publications, please send it to this e-mail.

Leeds (2008, UK)

Helsinki (2009, Finland)

  • Torben Grodal: Biology and Culture in Storytelling
  • Ian Macdonald: Thin air and solid ground: rethinking screenwriting research
  • David Howard: Beginning, Middle and End – Not Necessarily in that Order

Copenhagen (2010, Denmark)

  • Janet Steiger: Considering the Script as Blueprint in 2010
  • Steven Maras: On Disciplinarity, Practice, and Approach: Overcoming the ‘Object Problem’ in Screenwriting Research
  • Jill Nelmes: Analysing the Screenplay

Brussels (2011, Belgium)

  • David Bordwell: I Love a Mystery: Screenwriting and Storytelling in 1940s Hollywood
  • Jean-Claude Carrière: L’enseignement du scénario
  • Steven Price: The Screenplay: An Accelerated Critical History
  • Marida di Crosta: From Scriptwriting to Community Story-Telling

See abstracts of all papers

Sydney (2012, Australia)

  • Adrian Martin: Where Do Cinematic Ideas Come From?
  • Helen Grace: Moving Image on the Other Side of History
  • JJ Murphy: Where are you from? Place as an Alternative Form of Scripting
    • Keynote on the importance and value of treating location as another `character’ in independent cinema.

Madison, Wisconsin (2013, USA)

  • Larry Gross
  • Jon Raymond
  • Kristin Thompson

Potsdam-Babelsberg (2014, Germany)

  • Milcho Manchevski: Why I Like Writing and Hate Directing: Notes of a Recovering Writer-Director
  • Jutta Brückner: (Auto)biographic Storytelling
  • Brian Winston: Screenwriting in Documentary Filmmaking

London (2015, UK)

  • Hossein Amini
  • Kathryn Millard
    • In her keynote address she explored the relationship between improvisation and composition in creative practice and its particular relevance to the role of the writer in contemporary screen media and digital ecologies.
  • Jonathan Powell: Sculptors and plumbers: The writer and television
    • In his Keynote Address ‘Sculptors and Plumbers’ (from Billy Wilder’s famous comment that asking Scott Fitzgerald to write a screenplay was like hiring a great sculptor to do a plumbing job), Jonathan Powell looked at the intersection between inspiration and industry as it affects the writer’s place in the world of television fiction. He used his experience gained as a producer, commissioner and executive working with some of the leading British TV writers of the 20th Century and reflected on the position of the writer as the primary forcebehind the creation of drama for the smaller screen.
    • Full text: https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/27787478/1_Powell_AAM.pdf
    • Keynote was subsequently published in the Journal of Screenwriting: https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.7.3.255_3
  • Ronald Harwood (interviewed by Christine Geraghty)
  • Anamaria Marinca

Leeds (2016, UK)

  • Soni Jorgensen
    • In her keynote address she talked about developing unique screenplays by exploring the relationship between Character, Plot and the Human Experience.
  • Peter Bowker
  • Kristyn Gorton
    • Her talk will consider the role of emotion and affect within television. Drawing on examples from contemporary television and her work from Media Audiences, she will consider the ways in which emotion is constructed and valued in television.
  • Tony Garnett: What exactly is a screenplay? What is the place of a screenwriter? Individualism in a collaborative creative act
  • Liz Rosenthal
    • Liz will talk about taking a new approach to concept and story development, helping creatives and producers develop cross-platform, and interactive formats. At PttP’s Labs they have been creating methods to incubate projects in a new way where they get storytellers to approach development in a platform agnostic way, going back to core story concepts, thinking carefully about how to engage users on appropriate platforms and organically growing projects.

Dunedin (2017, New Zealand)

  • Ian W. Macdonald
  • Dave Gibson
  • Gaylene Preston
  • Fiona Samuel, Kathryn Burnett
  • Rachel Lang

Milan (2018, Italy)

  • Eleonora Andreatta: Public broadcasting in the global market era
    • Rai is a public service broadcaster whose identity is connected to the relationship it has with Italy, Italian values, history and culture. For this reason, Rai Fiction can’t be just a financier, but it is also a commissioning editor, with a complete vision of the product, and the clear challenge to deal with national and International audiences. Hence the need for an industrial studio-like structure, suitable for the production of Tv series, in order to get top ratings in Italy and to compete on a global level, leveraging on Italian history, art and creativity. Rai’s breakthrough: not only being a leader in Italian television but also partnering with global TV players, -from cable TV to on demand platforms-, to produce great International content.
  • Paolo Braga: Different Industries, Different Screenwriting Schools. The Italian storytelling approach to TV seriality compared to the US method
    • Each industry has its own way of crafting stories for TV. Different organizational models in the task of breaking down stories; the influence of titles which have been successful in a particular market; the peculiar viewing attitudes of a domestic audience… all these factors make screenwriters adopt a combination of writing techniques peculiar to each country. Even if the US writing school has imposed itself as a universal standard — the “orthodoxy” (I.W. Macdonald, 2013) — deviations from its lessons — slight or significant, depending on the case — define the originality of an industry’s storytelling. In this perspective, I am going to consider the Italian school of screenwriting for TV, in order to highlight what is unique to it in comparison to the North American narrative method. For this purpose, I will focus on two cases of international remakes. I will compare a) Red Band Society (Fox, 2014), the unsuccessful US version of the Catalan series Polseres Vermelles, to Braccialetti Rossi (Rai 1, 2014-2017), the successful Italian version of the same medical teen-drama, and b) Parenthood (NBC, 2010-2015), the original US version of a network family drama, to its Italian remake Tutto può succedere (Rai 1, 2015-present). My analyses will show that differences in the degree of thematization and the level of drama characters have to face within each episode are key elements to define the Italian school of writing for TV.
  • Warren Buckland: “Mind our mouths and beware our talk”: Stylometric analysis of character dialogue in The Darjeeling Limited
    • Film dialogue has recently received detailed scholarly attention (“Realism in Screenplay Dialogue,” Jill Nelmes 2013; Film Dialogue, edited by Jeff Jaeckle, 2013, etc.). In this paper I build upon this scholarship via current developments in Humanities Computing – specifically, stylometric studies that employ statistics to quantify the language of texts. I aim to study the distinctive linguistic traits of the dialogue in Wes Anderson’s films, and attempt to identify and quantify the stylistic habits (the distinctive voice) of individual characters. Analysis of the dialogue of the three Whitman brothers in The Darjeeling Limited (screenplay by Wes Anderson, Roman Coppola, and Jason Schwartzman, 2007) will serve as a case study.

This paper takes as its starting point J.F. Burrows’s seminal stylometric study of dialogue in Jane Austen’s novels (Burrows, Computation into Criticism, 1987), although it also draws upon more recent developments in computer-based stylometric studies (including Digital Literary Studies, by Hoover, Culpeper, and O’Halloran, 2014), plus the Voyant Tools software package. This paper forms part of a larger project that employs stylometric methods of authorship attribution to study the authorship of co-written screenplays.

  • Keynote speech was published by Journal of Screenwriting: https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/josc.10.2.131_1
  • Daniele Cesarano: The Pleasure of Storytelling. From Cinema to Television
    • I wrote my first script at 24, the last one at 54. The first was a film, which I also directed, full of unrealistic ambitions and quotes from other films. The last was the final episode of the first season of Suburra – The Series, full of unrealistic ambitions and self-citations. That’s why I decided to stop. I can not stay away from the ambitions. As a writer I went through the audiovisual revolution, the transition from cinema to television, which for me, but not only for me, was the transition from the duty of a story to the pleasure of the story-telling. It was the transition from having to mean something to the pleasure of entertaining. It was breathing. It was fun. It was the television series. At least as long as it lasted…
  • Luisa Cotta Ramosino: Medici. Masters of Florence. Challenges and compromises of an International coproduction: characters, storytelling and production issues.
    • Creating, writing and producing a period drama poses a series of challenges connected with the approach not only to the original historical materials, but also to the different traditions and practice of storytelling of the partners involved.

Deciding how far to go with creativity in interpreting the facts and how much faithful you want to be to the historical background is just the beginning of a process where finding a common language is the key.

Medici. Masters of Florence, a successful Tv series (Rai, Netflix, 2016- ; starring Dustin Hoffman and Richard Madden in its first season and Sean Bean and Daniel Sharman in the second one) created by two American screenwriters, produced by an Italian production company and an Italian public broadcaster with a London based writers room (where British and Italian authors shared their talent and practice) is an interesting case study of how and how much production preconditions can influence the storytelling both virtuously and negatively.

The evolution in the writing process along the now three seasons of the show (the third will be shot in the last months of 2018, when the second will be broadcasted) is the key to offer an insight on the difficult adventure of creating an International series starting from a country with a relatively small market and trying to get the best from different traditions both in terms of creativity and actual organization of work.

  • Neil Landau: Global TV On Demand: Authenticity and Empathy Across the Cultural Divide
    • How our need for human connection has expanded the global television marketplace from conventional, formulaic program genres into more localized, specific, authentic “native content”. This talk will explore the digital television revolution that’s disrupted the once dominant linear, broadcast network business models that once cast the broadest net in order to generate the highest possible overnight ratings into diverse, niche content with an emphasis on authenticity. Niche is the new mainstream, and the mandates at streaming (SVOD) behemoths like Netflix are variety and exclusivity. With Amazon, Hulu, Apple, Facebook, and YouTube all producing their own programs, there has never been a higher demand for fresh, non formulaic content, or a better time to showcase your unique, original voice as writer, producer, director and/or showrunner. The more specific you make a story, the more universal it becomes.

 

Porto (2019, Portugese)

  • Thomas Elsaesser – The (Re-)Turn to Non-Linear Storytelling: Time Travel and Looped Narratives
    • Why has there been such a comeback of looped narratives and time travel films since the 1990s? Answers to this question should take us beyond seeing films such as Groundhog Day, Deja Vu, Donnie Darko, Inception or Source Code as the implementation of the new possibilities of story-telling opened up by digital media, with non-linear editing and random access as the ‘new normal’. The reasons we can give should also take us beyond the evident analogies with interactive video games: In the age of ‘post truth’, when perception of reality itself has become malleable, the term ‘non-linear’ has taken on political, philosophical as well as narratological meaning. My talk will argue that there are also specifically historical circumstances that favour time travel as a mode that highlights not – as one might expect – new forms of agency and empowerment, but instead epistemological deadlocks, traumatic events as well as ethical dilemmas.
  • Christoph Bode – Opening Up Spaces of Possibility: How Future Narratives Impact Story-telling in the Movies
    • Future Narratives, unlike Past Narratives, are not about events(that have already occurred or can be imagined to have occurred). Rather, their smallest narrative unit is not an event, but a node. A node is a situation that can be continued in more than just one way, possibly in a multiplicity of ways. If a narrative contains at least one node, it qualifies as a Future Narrative, though many Future Narratives contain many more than just one node. If you don’t like the terminology, you could also call Future Narratives ‘Nodal Narratives’ instead. The most basic difference between Past Narratives and Future Narratives is that Past Narratives are uni-linear, whereas Future Narratives are by definition multi-linear. Past Narratives give you a uni-linear trajectory, but multi-linear Future Narratives open up spaces of possibility instead.

The exciting thing about Future Narratives is that they can be found in print, in film, in video games, in scenarios of world climate change, and in other simulations of future trends – they are all over the place. Cutting across all media and genre classifications and even straddling the fiction-non-fiction divide, the multifarious corpus of Future Narratives lacked a theory and a poetics until the publication of the 5-volume set of ERC-funded research in 2013, Narrating Futures(published with Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, all in the same year).

In my talk, I will try and explain how narrative in general negotiates the poles of order and chaos, or of meaning and contingency, and produces such a thing as the semblance of narrative necessity, before I zoom in on how Future Narratives prove a game-changer to this existential play and how, in particular, movies that operate according to the Future Narrative paradigm open up new spaces of possibility for the viewer as well: although not all relevant movies (e.g., Run Lola Run, Sliding Doors) invite active intervention from the spectators, others certainly do: they not only invite, they necessitate agency. Evidently, the move from relatively inflexible media like the book, the movie etc. to more inter-active media (DVD, online gaming …) is a decisive one. The advent of more and more Future Narrative-based offers in the second half of the twentieth century is therefore read as a shift of media-historical importance that is bound to radically re-define our ideas about what story-telling is for and who it is that ultimately produces the meaning we live by.

  • Maria Poulaki – Reflections on narrative complexity
    • This talk will reflect on the interplay between chaos and order as characteristic of the complexity of narrative. It will do so by adopting a complex systems perspective, which allows to approach at once complex textual structures and the complexity of our cognitive encounter with them. Concepts already established in narratology and traditionally associated with anti-narrative devices, such as self-reflexivity, loose causality, and description, can be linked to equivalent dynamic or ‘chaotic’ processes of systems’ emergence, such as self-reference, nonlinearity, and emergence. These can in turn be highlighted as properties of the cognitive dynamics of narrative, driven by ambiguity and uncertainty. Thus narrative complexity lies ‘before’ narrative (the latter traditionally conceived as a set ordered schema or structure), and in the chaotic process of its formation.

 

Oxford (2021, online)

  • Elizabeth Kilgarriff: Pushing the boundaries between industry and academia (in conversation with Paolo Russo)
  • Murray Smith: The portability of character

 

Vienna (2022, Austria)

  • Eleftheria Thanouli: Complexity and/ or agency? character, agency and plot structures in post-classical narration
  • Dina Iordinova: Bridging platforms and continents: the normative narrator

 

Columbia, Missouri (2023, USA)

 

Olomouc (2024, Czech Republic)

  • Peter Krämer: Auteurism, Adaptations and Beyond: Reflections on 40 Years of Studying Production Histories and Story Development
  • Kamila Zlatušková: Education as a way to dialogue between new creators and major broadcasters
  • Donat F. Keutsch, Gabriele C. Sindler: PROCLAMATION ON BREAKING THE RULES! Insights into the skills and the practical art of story & script development.

Call for Papers: Early Career Researchers Online Symposium

Looking towards the Future

ECR2021 Online Symposium for Screenwriting/Screenplay Early Career Researchers

Call for Papers for the 2021 ‘Looking towards the Future’ online symposium specifically aimed at SRN Early Career Researchers taking place the week commencing 15th of November. It follows the SRN2021 Research Seminar Series.

The symposium is a unique opportunity for early career researchers to present and discuss their on-going research with the wider research field.

Presentations should be pre-recorded and no longer than 10 minutes. The purpose of each presentation is to introduce on-going research and highlight a specific research question under examination that can be discussed during a live panel. Ending the presentation with queries to the listeners and fellow panelists are encouraged to make the live sessions as engaging as possible. This could, for example, be archive or reference related queries as well as broader questions of publication outlets and possible collaborations.

The presentations will be organised into panels depending on topics and time zones with no more than 4 presenters in each panel. The Early Career Representative, Ann Igelstrom, will chair the live panels together with a researcher from the specific field under discussion. The pre-recorded presentations will be uploaded and made available on the SRN2021 Research Seminar Series website. Questions by attendees can be submitted ahead of the live panel.
During the live panels, each presenter gives a brief summary of their presentation (2 min) followed by a discussion with fellow panelists and attendees led by the chair. The session ends with a general conversation. The aim is that the panels do not exceed one hour to maximise the ease to attend and minimise ‘screen fatigue’.

The number of panels and exact dates will be decided depending on received and accepted abstracts.

Please submit your abstract (max 300 words) together with a short bio before 10th of August. This allows enough time to organise the event and makes it possible to introduce the Symposium program and panelists during the SRN2021 Research Seminar Series.

Please send your submission and any queries to [email protected]

SRN2021 Research Seminar Series Online

Dear SRN2021 Delegates and SRN Members,

Finally!

I am now able to announce the proposed format and dates for the SRN2021 Research Seminar Series Online (replacing the SRN2021 Annual Conference originally due to be hosted in Oxford). You will find all the facts and info here below: be prepared, it’s a long list with lots of bullet points (if more convenient you can find all the details in the enclosed PDF as well). It goes without saying, this is the initial plan with lots of TBCs and TBDs yet to be sorted out, and therefore things may still change.

 

FORMAT

–       [BEFORE] Papers: pre-recorded 15-minute presentations (to be made available in advance via the event website; so far we expecting as many as 90). Delegates are asked to watch as many as possible so as to enable lively discussions during the relevant live sessions.

–       [DURING] Live sessions (via Zoom, see dates below):

o   24x chaired Q&A panels (3-4 papers each): each speaker will be asked to give a 3-minute abstract of their respective pre-recorded paper presentations, followed by 30-35’ interactive discussion (chairs will be able to collect questions from all attendees – in person or via the chat boxes – during as well as before their live sessions).

o   2x Keynote speakers.

o   2x AGMs (includes EC elections): the same session run twice, to cover all time zones.

o   SRN Awards: prize winners announced by Jury + 2x winners’ 30-minute lectures.

o   2x Working Groups (TBC)

o   1 or 2 Round Tables (TBD)

o   1x Projects and Collaborations (TBD)

o   “Happy hours”: at the end of many live sessions attendees will be able to stay online for one more hour of networking, informal chatting, etc.

–       [AFTER] Bonus content (via Zoom, TBC):

o   Special guests (TBD)

o   1 or 2 “SRN in Conversation with…” (TBD)

o   SRN Early Career Researchers 2021 Symposium (November, TBC)

 

DATES

[BEFORE] Pre-recorded presentations

All shortlisted speakers will be asked to submit a pre-recorded 15-minute presentation of their paper in advance so as to give all delegates enough time to watch as many as possible before the scheduled live sessions. Please plan to record and submit your presentations according to the following rules of thumb:

–       Ideal world deadline for submission: ASAP in June/July. In other words, start now and submit as soon as you can.

–       Formal deadline: 31 July 2021, however…

–       “If-you-still-can’t-make-it” deadline: any time after that, in the awareness that the later you submit, the less time other delegates will have to watch it.

 

Guidelines for recording and submitting presentations:

–       File type for submission: MP4

–       Is there a maximum file size: no, but on average a 15-minute mp4 file tends to be 3-600 MB.

–       How do I submit my MP4 file? Hopefully, I will be able to set up a dedicated submission dropbox to share with everyone ASAP. Until then, a few options are:

o   Upload it to your GoogleDrive/OneDrive or similar, than share it with me, or

o   Upload it to DropBox and share it with me, or

o   Send it to me via WeTransfer

Pick anyone that you can use for free.

–       Maximum duration: 15 minutes. In my experience, slightly shorter pre-recorded presentation are much more effective than longer ones and consider the subsequent live session/Q&A an integral (if delayed) part of your presentation as well. As a rule of thumb, begin the recording by introducing your core research question briefly, avoid excessive contextualizing/framing, then argue your 3-4 main points concisely and leave the audience wanting for more during the live session (when you can have all your other notes at hand to complement your presentation).

–       What device should you use to record your presentation? Any – PC, Mac, tablet, phone, camera, webcam, Zoom recording (or similar), etc.

–       What format should your presentation be? Again, any, as long as it suits the presentation. Examples include but are not limited to:

o   You simply reading your paper to camera

o   A PowerPoint/Keynote presentation + you reading your paper as Voice Over

o   A PowerPoint/Keynote presentation + you reading your paper to camera in PiP in one corner of the screen

  • Note: if you use slides (in any app) summarize the main points of your arguments as opposed to cram them with long paragraphs pasted verbatim from your paper.

o   A video-essay (either formal, creative, performative)

o   A podcast-like presentation (audio only, no video)

o   A mix of the above

–       Can you embed clips/include citations in your presentations? Yes, you can, within “fair use” limits as you would normally do in an in-person paper presentation, as long as you cite sources correctly.

o   Try to limit the use of embedded clips anyway as they will eat away time from your 15-minute allocation. If available, it is best to provide links/references to freely available online resources that can be consulted by delegates when watching your presentations. Remember that delegates will watch presentations in asynchronous before the live sessions and therefore they are not bound to the 15-minute limit of the presentation itself.

 

[DURING] Live sessions

 

Five (5) dates for your calendar!

 

  • Monday 30 August
  • Friday 3 September
  • Wednesday 8 September
  • Monday 13 September
  • Friday 17 September

 

In the past year I have attended about 20 online conferences/festivals/events/seminar series trying to figure out what works best and what not. I can say, without a doubt, that:

–       Those who tried to simply transfer their original in-person conference schedule/format online failed regularly. It simply won’t work like that online.

–       Attending any online event for more than 3-4 hours straight is most counterproductive, let alone full-day sessions (I managed to attend one that started at 8.30 am and ended at 10 pm for three days – I will abstain from adding any comments).

–       Events that schedule several days in a row tend to see their audience wane exponentially the longer they went on.

–       On the other hand, events that scheduled sessions are regular intervals every few days over a few weeks (essentially turning into a “series” of dates) generally worked rather well.

 

So, on the five days listed above we will have:

–       All our papers Q&A sessions: these will all be one-hour slots – 50 mins. discussion + 10’ break (see above for some more details)

–       Keynotes, AGMs, Round Tables, SRN Awards: these will likely be 75-90 mins.

 

TIME ZONES

After much thinking, calculating, trialling and errors, I can confirm that we will follow two main criteria for scheduling our live sessions: 1) by time zone/geographic area, and 2) thematic grouping (based on papers’ keywords/content).

However, I have realized that the best way to proceed is to split our planet/time zones into 2 big regions rather than 3. This takes into account the fact that, although we do have speakers whose geolocation spans 20 time zones, the vast majority are still from Europe. Therefore, the following schedule will divide each Live Session Day into two slots of roughly 4 hours each:

 

US West US

East

South America Western Europe Central Europe & Africa Eastern Europe Middle East India Western Australia Japan & Central Australia Eastern Australia New Zealand
Slot 1 24-4 3-7 4-8 8-12 9-13 10-14 11-15 12.30-16.30 15-19 16-20 (+30’) 17-21 20-24
Slot 2 9-13 12-16 13-17 17-21 18-22 19-23 20-24 21.30-1.30 24-4 1-5 (+30’) 2-6 5-9

 

While it’s basically impossible to have colleagues from the Americas and from Asia-Pacific attending live simultaneously (unless they decide to burn the past-midnight oil), the above will allow for the largest and broadest possible audience: Slot 1 will be on in the morning (for Western and Central Europe), early afternoon (for Eastern Europe, Africa, Middle East and India), and in the late afternoon/evening (for Asia-Pacific countries); a 5-hour break will then be followed by Slot 2, which will allow attendance at decent hours for colleagues in the US (morning and early afternoon), in South America (late afternoon), in Europe and Africa (late afternoon/evening), as well as in the Middle and India (albeit in the late evening).

The AGM will be run in both slots so as to give everyone the same chance to attend and participate in the discussion and in the EC Elections.

By the way, as you know, you have time until Sunday 20 June 2021, 3 pm (UK time) to vote the motion to amend two articles of the SRN Constitution (see email sent out on 20th May) to enable hosting AGMs and EC elections virtually. You will receive plenty of details soon enough once the results are in, so I won’t add any here.

 

ZOOM AND RECORDINGS

In all likelihood, we’ll be using Zoom for our live sessions. As I will be setting up all sessions, I will be able to use my University’s license which grants unlimited use and allows for up to 1,000 participants in Meeting mode (the one with interactive audience, as opposed to the boring Webinar mode, where only hosts and speakers can be seen and heard).

I will then make all chairs and speakers co-hosts.

It doesn’t matter whether you or your university have a Zoom license: once you register for a session, you will receive a link to attend freely. You will be able to log in to Zoom either within your browser or you can download the Zoom app for free on any device.

We are also exploring the possibility of streaming the live sessions via YouTube and/or Facebook: this option won’t require prior registration and logging it to Zoom, but you may not be able to interact with the speakers and the other delegates (yes, I know, we can use the chat boxes on YouTube and Facebook as well, but that will depend on how many people will be on hand to help out in any given session – so let’s say we will follow up on this with more precise details in due course).

We will record all live sessions so as to make them available via the SRN2021 website to all those delegates and members who cannot attend live. However, we will likely require registration to access all recorded content.

 

[AFTER] Bonus content

 I am trying to organize a few extra events that will hopefully make SRN 2021 an even more lively and engaging event. I have contacted a few guests from the industry (writers, producers, a few policymakers) and am awaiting their responses regarding their availability to join us for some informal conversations and Q&A. If available, I will leave them the option to choose from either a live session or a pre-recorded one to be then shared with you. In any case, as a rule these extra sessions will be at later dates in September/October (unless their availability is limited to one of the dates above, in which case we might want to shuffle things around a bit).

The same goes for another possible type of extra session. As you will remember, a couple of months ago the Executive Committee launched the first of a series of recorded sessions titled “SRN in Conversation with…” past conference organizers with the aim of building a memory archive or our main events and activities of the past 15 years. We have more in the pipeline, and it might well be that one or two could be planned for the Autumn. In which case, again, we have a choice of pre-recording it, just like the first one, or going live and give access to all of you for more interactivity.

Finally, we also have one more event in store for you – likely to be in November 2021. The Early Career Researcher Symposium will be announced later in June (via a regular CfP) and will be organized by our ECR rep on the EC, Ann Igelström. Although the ECR Symposium will be a stand-alone event in its own right and with its own format, we can consider it as a great closing event to what is going to be a very exciting Autumn season despite having to postpone meeting in person for another year. All ECR will be eligible to submit a proposal for the Symposium, including those who will participate in the Seminar Series in September should they wish so. Stay tuned for more soon!

So… Is that all? Pretty much but not necessarily. If you have any further suggestions, just throw them our way and we can discuss whether they can make a good addition to this programme of online activities.

 

Help needed!

Many of you have already come forward to help out with the Seminar Series. Thank you ever so much to all of you and I will be contacting each one of you in the next few weeks: perhaps we can arrange a Zoom briefing session so we all get together and get an idea of what I might need from you apart from the usual chairing. Although, in principle, some help in coordinating by geographic area might be the main priority.

 

Website and registration

Most pages on what used to be the SRN2020 website are now disabled as I am redesigning it and repurposing it for the SRN2021 Seminar Series Online. The idea is to make the website the go-to navigation platform for the event, with lots of useful features, a repository for the pre-recorded presentations, links to everything (recordings and live sessions), guidelines, as well as a thematic map of the content shared by everyone. After all, our Annual conferences (and their current virtual replacement) are all about exchanging our research findings, networking, finding shared interests, etc. I will do my best to make sure that the website enables all this in the best possible way. I have also obtained some funds to purchase a Business WordPress domain which means all the event content will be available to registered delegates/members for the next two years at last, so the exchanges are not limited to the live interaction next September.

As soon as the website is ready, it will include instructions to register to attend the SRN2021 Research Seminar Series Online. Registration will be FREE but required as it will give us the chance to monitor and optimize access to all content and sessions, and avoid any uninvited guests (e.g. Zoom bombing and similar).

* * *

 

Quite a lot to digest already, but more (and more precise) information yet to come in the forthcoming weeks.

Any clarification needed, just give me a shout.

 

Take very good care of yourselves

Best

Paolo Russo BA PhD

Screenwriting Research Network Chairperson

 

A PDF version of this text can be accessed here.

London Screenwriting Research Seminar

The London Screenwriting Research Seminar has been established by a group of academics at Royal Holloway University of London and elsewhere in the London region, associated with the newly launched Journal of Screenwriting and the Screenwriting Research Network. Founder members include Adam Ganz, Sue Clayton and Barry Langford (all Royal Holloway), Jill Nelmes (University of East London) editor of the Journal of Screenwriting and Analysing the Screenplay, Rosamund Davies (University of Greenwich) and Stephen Price (University of Bangor).

The seminar explores the study of the screenplay and the practice of screenwriting as an academic discipline and object of scholarly enquiry. We explore the nature of writing for the moving image in the broadest sense, from a broad range of possible methodologies and approaches, considering in particular: the history and poetics of the form, contextual analysis, the process of writing for the moving image, and the relationship of word and image in the production process.

There are some podcasts available.

Read More…

Poetics and Politics of Documentary Film, Research Symposium at the Aalto, Helsinki, Finland

The aim of the Poetics and Politics symposium is to strenghten dialogue between theory and practice in documentary film. We wish to promote a forum for discussions on the possibilities and approaches on practice-based research and theorizing that stems from artistic work. Filmmakers and scholars interested in conceptual approaches in documentary film are welcome to attend.

Vietnamese-American filmmaker and theorist Trinh T. Minh-ha will participate in the event and give a keynote lecture on Monday, April 22. On Tuesday morning, April 23, professor Brian Winston from the UK will give a second keynote.  The programme consists of 10 parallell sessions where filmmakers and academics present their work.  In addition, two recent documentary films are screened.

The conference fee is 85 euros and includes lunches, coffees and a get-together party on Monday evening. More information and instructions for registration are available on the

http://documentarysymposium.wordpress.com

The symposium is organized by the Department of Film, Television and Scenography at Aalto University ARTS, Helsinki, Finland.

London Screenwriting Seminar – Ch. Barr, S. French and N. Gerrard podcasts

Here is a communication from Adam Ganz, Senior Lecturer from the Department of Media Arts, Royal Holloway University of London.

Thank you, Adam.

There were some requests for podcasts of our previous seminars and these are now available online.

Charles Barr on “Hitchcock and his Writers” is here

Sean French and Nicci Gerrard talking about being adapted is here


These are both downloadable through iTunes.

Many thanks to the Institute of English Studies for making this possible.

London Screenwriting Research Seminar – Dr Eva Novrup Redvall

We are delighted to welcome at the next session of the London Screenwriting Research Seminar on Thursday 21st of March Dr Eva Novrup Redvall from the University of Copenhagen who will be speaking on

“Writing and Producing Television Drama in Denmark: The Writing of Borgen”

Venue:  STB3/6 (Stewart House, basement Next to Senate House) Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. (nearest tube Russell Square).

Dr Eva Novrup Redvall is Assistant Professor at the University of Copenhagen. She has spent time observing the Writers Room for Borgen as part of a major research project into the Writing and Production of Television Drama Series from Danmarks Radio, with the support of The Danish Council for Independent Research | Humanities (FKK)) This will be published in English as “Writing and Producing Television Drama in Denmark: From The Kingdom to The Killing” by Palgrave Macmillan later in 2013
She is also film critic for the daily Danish newspaper Information and part of the programming team for the Göteborg International Film Festival.

All welcome  -refreshments will be provided.

More information about London Screenwriting Research Seminar here.